Am I the only one who thinks that Idaho Republican Senator Larry Craig is full of hot air when he admitted that he did nothing wrong in the incident that took place in June of 2007! This is just another case of a "down low brotha." For those of you who are not as familiar with the term, "down low" describes an otherwise "straight" man who likes having sex with other men. It's clear to me that Larry Craig was soliciting sex based on the report filed by the involved plain-clothes police officer. [1]
"At 1215 the male in the stall to the left flushed the toilet and exited the stall. Craig entered the stall and placed his roller bag against the front of the stall door. My experience has shown that individuals engaging in lewd conduct use their bags to block the view from the front of the stall....At 1218 Craig tapped his right foot. I recognized this as a signal used by persons wishing to engage in lewd conduct. Craig tapped his toes several times and moved his foot closer to my foot. I moved my foot up and down slowly....At 1217 I saw Craig swipe his hand under the stall divider for a few seconds. The swipe went in the direction from the front of the stall back towards the back wall. His palm was facing towards the ceiling as he guided it (along) the stall divider...Craig swiped his hand again for a few seconds in the same motion a third time for a few seconds...I could also see Craig had a gold ring on his ring finger as his hand was on my side of the stall divider.."
This police report reads like a salacious gay novel. Well, except that there is no steamy sex scene. Then again, I don't think I could even stomach seeing this sixty-two year old Senator shirtless. He looks like he ought to be rocking in a chair somewhere reading Bernstein Bears to his grandkids and sipping on prune juice. Instead, he's trying to pick up some stranger in an airport bathroom that I'm sure smells like piss and is as filthy as a Motel 8. Talk about desperate. I don't feel bad for him. Now, if he was willing to admit that he was gay, then maybe I could emphasize, but this guy is downplaying his sexuality to salvage what few remains he has left of his political career. If he wanted gay sex, then he should have just said so. It's not like he'll be much of anything once this all settles down. He'll probably get convicted of some ethics charges and be forced to resign from his post. Then, like Ted Haggard, and before him, Mark Foley, and before him Jim McGreevey, he'll live out a somewhat pathetic life. Why can't we just accept that even "straight" men like having sex with men!








